Scientific Surveys Ltd The Premiere Pipeline Portal
SSL HomeAbout SSLSSL LinksContact UsFeedback SSL Store
Start here, you'll be able to search products by Title, Publication Date, Keywords, or browse by Category.
Keep items in your cart, continue shopping
Click here when you're done buying.
An account is required to use ssl's secure commerce engine
Once created, you may proceed to either modify your account or continue to purchase items.
View Cart
Check the items you've put in your cart for purchase.
Order Status
Find out where your order is.


Displaying records 206 through 206 of 2180
First Prior Next Last
Qty:  Add to Cart
Special! Free shipping on this item!
Title: An investigation into the failure of a 40-in diameter crude oil pipeline
Downloadable: Yes 
Catalog No.: 2316s
Date of Publication: 2014-03-01
Price: $25.00 US
Authors: by Mohamed Dafea, Dr Phil Hopkins, Roland Palmer-Jones, Patrick de Bourayne, and Lionel Blin
Abstract: IN AUGUST 2009, there was a 2.5-m long rupture in the longitudinal seam weld of a crude oil pipeline in France. The failure caused a spillage of approximately 2000 cubic metres in a protected area. This rupture caused the authorities to withdraw the permit to operate a 260-km long section of this pipeline.

The pipeline had a similar failure in August, 1980. The 1980 failure was attributed to a fatigue crack initiating at the inner side of the longitudinal weld. There was evidence of ‘roof topping’ along this weld.

Penspen Ltd was contracted by the pipeline operator Société du Pipeline Sud Européen (SPSE) to carry out an independent investigation into the cause of the 2009 failure, review and confirm the actions needed for safe short-term operation to allow internal inspection, and determine a safe future life for the pipeline.

The failed pipe specimen was not immediately available for inspection. An initial analysis indicated that a purely analytical evaluation would not provide conclusive results, due to variability in material properties, geometry, and loading. It was decided that a better understanding of the behaviour of defects in the pipe, and the fatigue performance, was required.

A detailed laboratory programme of burst and fatigue testing on a section of linepipe was recommended. The tests were carried out on a combination of ‘defect- free’1 ring specimens, and ring specimens with initial electric-discharge-machined (EDM) slits to represent crack-like defects. These tests showed:

1. Burst tests: The failure pressures of the burst tests could be predicted using a recognized industry model. Roof topping, laminations and inclusions, and toughness variations were found to have no noticeable effect on the defect size at failure.
2. Fatigue tests: The fatigue test results showed that defect-free rings had a fatigue life one order of magnitude longer than those containing an EDM slit, and that the fatigue life of a defect-free ring could be predicted using a standard S-N method. In addition, it was found that crack growth was conservatively predicted using standard fatigue-fracture mechanics.

The fatigue test results showed that the 1980 and the 2009 failures were caused by a combination of cyclic pressure loading, roof topping, and a pre-existing weld defect (probably present when the pipeline went into service in 1972).

This paper provides an overview of the failure investigation, with a discussion of the ring testing, supporting tests, and fracture surface inspection.
SSL Home Copyright | Privacy Statement